Previous Page
  Next Page
 
Evokation
 
 
Index
 

 

 

 

THE JOURNEYMAN 1977

 

 

 

THE JOURNEYWOMAN 1977

 

 

 

THE NUCLEAR FAMILY 1969

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
9
-
-
-
-
5
6
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
6
-
8
+
=
43
4+3
=
7
=
7
=
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
9
-
-
-
-
14
15
-
-
-
19
-
-
-
-
24
-
26
+
=
115
1+1+5
=
7
=
7
=
7
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-
-
1
2
3
4
-
-
7
8
9
-
2
3
4
5
-
7
-
+
=
83
8+3
=
11
1+1
2
=
2
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-
-
10
11
12
13
-
-
16
17
18
-
20
21
22
23
-
25
-
+
=
236
2+3+6
=
11
1+1
2
=
2
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
+
=
351
3+5+1
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
+
=
126
1+2+6
=
9
=
9
=
9
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
1
occurs
x
3
=
3
=
3
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
2
occurs
x
3
=
6
=
6
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
3
occurs
x
3
=
9
=
9
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
+
=
4
occurs
x
3
=
12
1+2
3
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
+
=
5
occurs
x
3
=
15
1+5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
+
=
6
occurs
x
3
=
18
1+8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
+
=
7
occurs
x
3
=
21
2+1
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
+
=
8
occurs
x
3
=
24
2+4
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
9
occurs
x
2
=
18
1+8
9
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
45
-
-
26
-
126
-
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4+5
-
-
2+6
-
1+2+6
-
5+4
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
9
-
-
8
-
9
-
9
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
-
-
9
-
-
8
-
9
-
9

 

 

JUST SIX NUMBERS

Martin Rees

1
999

OUR COSMIC HABITAT

PLANETS STARS AND LIFE

Page 24

A

proton

is

1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836

would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence'

 

 

Flying Saucers and Science

A Scientisis Investigates The MYSTERIES OF UFOs

Stanton T. Friedman 2008

Chapter 5 The Cult of Seti

Page 145

The Fermi Paradox

"Two key scientists who were involved were Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch. They published a paper and shared information with Niels Bohr, the great Danish physicist. He brought the details to the United States. It was then determined that fission had actually taken place with the release of an amount of energy / Page 146 / indicating that the difference in the weight of the new atoms and the original uranium atom had been converted to energy by the famous E = mc2 equation. (E stands for energy, m for mass and c is the speed of light.) A key discovery was that the fission also produced more neutrons immediately indicating that a nuclear reaction was possible."

 

 

AUTOBIOGRAPHY

OF

A

YOGI

Paramahansa Yogananda 1946

"Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe." - John 4:48

Page 275

The Law of Miracles

"Among the trillion mysteries of the cosmos the most phenomenal is light."

"In the gigantic conceptions of Einstein the velocity of light - 186,300 miles per second dominate the whole Theory of Relativity."

 

" I am grateful to you for granting me some insight into this fascinating world. Thomas Mann"

 

 

 

 

ISISIS

CHRISTOS THAT CHRISTOS ISISIS ISISIS CHRISTOS THAT CHRISTOS

ISISIS

 

 

WISDOM OF THE EAST

by Hari Prasad Shastri 1948

Page 8

"There is no such word in Sanscrita as 'Creation' applied to the universe. The Sanscrita word for Creation is Shristi, which means 'projection' Creation means to bring something into being out /Page 9/ of nothing, to create, as a novelist creates a character. There was no Miranda, for example, until Shakespeare created her. Similarly the ancient Indians (this term is innacurately used as there was no India at that time). who were our ancestors long, long ago. used a word for creation that means 'projection'

 

 

THE LOST LANGUAGE OF SYMBOLISM

Harold Bayley 1912

Page 278

""According to the authors of The Perfect Way, the words IS and ISH originally meant Light, and the name ISIS, once ISH-ISH, was Egyptian for Light-Light."

 

6
ISH-ISH
72
36
9
4
ISHI
45
36
9

 

Page 278

"ONE-EYE, TWO-EYES, THREE-EYES"

"According to the authors of The Perfect Way, the words IS and ISH originally meant Light, and the name ISIS, once ISH-ISH,

T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
E
=
5
-
3
EYE
35
17
8
O
=
6
-
2
OF
21
12
3
R
=
9
-
2
RA
19
10
1
-
-
22
-
10
Add to Reduce
108
54
18
-
-
2+2
-
1+0
Reduce to Deduce
1+0+8
5+4
1+8
-
-
4
-
1
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

-
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
+
=
14
1+4
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
-
-
+
=
23
2+3
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
5
-
5
7
5
-
-
6
-
9
1
+
=
40
4+0
=
4
=
4
=
4
-
-
20
-
5
-
5
25
5
-
-
6
-
18
1
+
=
85
8+5
=
13
1+3
4
=
4
-
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
8
5
-
5
25
5
-
15
6
-
18
1
+
=
108
1+0+8
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
-
2
8
5
-
5
7
5
-
6
6
-
9
1
+
=
54
5+4
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
``-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
occurs
x
1
=
1
=
1
-
``-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
occurs
x
1
=
2
=
2
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
THREE
3
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
FOUR
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
3
=
15
1+5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
6
occurs
x
2
=
12
1+2
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
occurs
x
1
=
7
=
7
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
occurs
x
1
=
8
=
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
occurs
x
1
=
9
=
9
7
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
38
-
-
10
-
54
-
36
-
1+0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
3+8
-
-
1+0
-
5+4
-
3+6
7
1
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
11
-
-
1
-
9
-
9
4
-
2
8
5
-
5
7
5
-
6
6
-
9
1
-
-
1+0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
1
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
2
-
-
1
-
9
-
9

 

 

10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
+
=
14
1+4
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
-
-
+
=
23
2+3
=
5
=
5
=
5
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
5
-
5
7
5
-
-
6
-
9
1
+
=
40
4+0
=
4
=
4
=
4
-
20
-
5
-
5
25
5
-
-
6
-
18
1
+
=
85
8+5
=
13
1+3
4
=
4
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
8
5
-
5
25
5
-
15
6
-
18
1
+
=
108
1+0+8
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
2
8
5
-
5
7
5
-
6
6
-
9
1
+
=
54
5+4
=
9
=
9
=
9
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
occurs
x
1
=
1
=
1
``-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
occurs
x
2
=
2
=
2
-
-
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
3
=
15
1+5
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
6
occurs
x
2
=
12
1+2
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
occurs
x
1
=
7
=
7
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
occurs
x
1
=
8
=
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
9
occurs
x
1
=
9
=
9
10
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
38
-
-
10
-
54
-
36
1+0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
3+8
-
-
1+0
-
5+4
-
3+6
1
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
11
-
-
1
-
9
-
9
-
2
8
5
-
5
7
5
-
6
6
-
9
1
-
-
1+0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
T
H
E
-
E
Y
E
-
O
F
-
R
A
-
-
2
-
-
1
-
9
-
9

 

 

T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
I
=
9
-
1
I
9
9
9
O
=
6
-
2
OF
21
12
3
R
=
9
-
2
R
18
9
9
-
-
18
-
10
Add to Reduce
81
54
27
-
-
1+8
-
1+0
Reduce to Deduce
8+1
5+4
2+7
-
-
4
-
1
Essence of Number
9
9
9

 

 

-
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
-
-
+
=
23
2+3
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
15
-
-
-
+
=
32
3+2
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
5
-
-
-
-
6
-
9
+
=
22
2+2
=
4
=
4
=
4
-
-
20
-
5
-
-
-
-
6
-
18
+
=
49
4+9
=
13
1+3
4
=
4
-
10
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
8
5
-
9
-
15
6
-
18
+
=
81
8+1
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
-
2
8
5
-
9
-
6
6
-
9
+
=
45
4+5
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
ONE
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
``-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
occurs
x
1
=
2
=
2
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
THREE
3
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
FOUR
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
1
=
5
=
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
6
-
-
-
-
6
occurs
x
2
=
12
1+2
3
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
SEVEN
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
occurs
x
1
=
8
=
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
9
occurs
x
2
=
18
1+8
9
15
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
30
-
-
7
-
45
-
27
1+5
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
3+0
-
-
-
-
4+5
-
2+7
6
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
9
-
9
-
4
2
8
5
-
9
-
6
6
-
9
-
-
4
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
6
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
9
-
9

 

 

7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
-
-
+
=
23
2+3
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
15
-
-
-
+
=
32
3+2
=
5
=
5
=
5
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
5
-
-
-
-
6
-
9
+
=
22
2+2
=
4
=
4
=
4
-
20
-
5
-
-
-
-
6
-
18
+
=
49
4+9
=
13
1+3
4
=
4
10
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
8
5
-
9
-
15
6
-
18
+
=
81
8+1
=
9
=
9
=
9
-
2
8
5
-
9
-
6
6
-
9
+
=
45
4+5
=
9
=
9
=
9
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
``-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
occurs
x
1
=
2
=
2
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
1
=
5
=
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
6
-
-
-
-
6
occurs
x
2
=
12
1+2
3
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
occurs
x
1
=
8
=
8
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
9
occurs
x
2
=
18
1+8
9
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
30
-
-
7
-
45
-
27
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
3+0
-
-
-
-
4+5
-
2+7
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
9
-
9
4
2
8
5
-
9
-
6
6
-
9
-
-
4
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
7
T
H
E
-
I
-
O
F
-
R
-
-
3
-
-
7
-
9
-
9

 

 

Daily Mail

Monday, February 23,2009

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS

Compiled by Charles Legge

Page 57

 

QUESTION

Are the three stars that make up Orion's belt a similar distance from the Earth or do they just appear that way?

ORION, the giant huntsman of Greek mythology whom Zeus placed among the stars as the constellation, has three stars of apparently similar brightness and colo (bluish-white) in his belt, given the Arabic names (from left to right) Alnitak, Alnilam and Mintaka.

In fact, Alnitak is 800 light years away from us, Alnilam 1,300 light years and Mintaka 900 light years. Thy appear in a straight line only in our line of sight.

Despite this, the three stars appear to be closely associated. Each is a luminous, hot `supergiant', haviing luminosities at least 100,000 times that of the Sun, and surface temperatures exceeding 25,000c (our Sun is 5,500c).
It's believed the three stars, and several other equal hot and luminous stars in the constellation Orion, wei formed together as a close cluster. The passage of time has seen them drift apart.
Such luminous stars use up hydrogen at a prodigious rate so they're only a few million years old and have n more than a few million years to live before blowing themselves up in a supernova explosion.
These timescales are short in astronomical terms. Our Sun, with its far lower luminosity and lower fuel consumption, has shone for five billion years and is expected to shine steadily for the same amount of time again before it, too, dies, in a much more sedate fashion than a supernova explosion.

The five billion years that our Sun has been around has meant that life has had time to develop on one of its planets — Earth.
It seems most unlikely that any hypothetical planet around a star in Orion's belt could have developed any sort of life when the history of the star, from birth to death, is only a few million years.

Norman Wallace, Sutton Coldfield, W. Mids.

 

 

Daily Mail

Thursday, February 26,2009

Page 37

The eye of God!

IT STARES down at us from the depths of space, watching our tiny world from 700 light years away. Scientists have nicknamed the image - captured by a giant telescope on the Chilean mountains - the eye of God.
In fact, it shows the death throes of a star similar to our Sun. The blue pupil, the white of the eye and pink lid are created by layers of gas and dust thrown off and illuminated by the star as it comes to the end of its life over the course of thousands of years.
The eye, known as the Helix nebula, is so huge that it would take a beam of light two-and-a-half years to cross it.
Our own sun is expected to suffer a similar fate - but not for five billion years.

 

 

Daily Mail

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Page 11

Hand of God

Eye in the sky: The Helix nebula

By Dan Newlin;

(Image omitted)

WE'VE already seen pictures of his eye ... now we have the first image of the hand of God.
The ghostly blue cloud seems to form an outstretched thumb and fingers grasping a burning lump of coal. This astonishing image was taken by Nasa's Chandra X-ray observatory, which is orbiting 360 miles above the Earth's surface.
It recalls those of the Helix planetary nebula, whose blue centre surrounded by white clouds earned it the nickname 'the eye of God'.
The hand was created when a star exploded in a supernova, creating a rapidly-spinning 12-mile-wide star called a pulsar, which is deep inside the white blob at the hand's wrist.
The pulsar is spewing out enormous amounts of electromagnetic energy, creating a dust and gas cloud so wide that it would take a light beam 150 years to cross from side to side.
The red disc is a separate cloud of gas. The fingers are thought to have been created as the energy passed from the pulsar to this gas cloud.
Nasa scientists estimate the moment depicted here actually happened 17,000 years ago. it has taken since then for the X-rays, travelling at 670million mph, to reach Earth.

 

 

Daily Mail

Friday, February 27, 2009

Page 70

Case of Moore, not less

QUESTION

Former World Cup-winning footballer George Cohen says that in his playing days you were given an England cap only if you played for the full 90 minutes this was the case, how many times did Bobby Moore actual play for England? How much longer than David Beckham did he stay on the pitch?

PLAYERS who represent England at senior level, whether they start a match or come on in the very last minute as a substitute, receive an international cap from the FA.

Bobby Moore started every international match for which was selected and only once did he fail to complete the full 90 miniutes. He received a full cap for each of his 108 appearances.
He made his England debut against Peru in Lima in May 1962 and his last outing was against Italy at Wembley in November 1973

David Beckham, so far, has played in 108 full international for England. He has, however, acted as a substitute in nine of tlhose matches, making the starting lineup on only 99 occasions. But too, has a full allocation of caps in his locker (all 108).
Beckham, it has to be said, an awful lot of catching up to he is to break Moore's total of 9,685 minutes (including two lots of extra-time) on the pitch.

As of this month (following record-equalling appearances against Spain), the former Manchester United and Real Madrid star is on loan from LA Galaxy to Milan, had played just under 9000 minutes for his country. And remember, he has also been sent off twice in England games - against Argentina and Austria.

Tony Matthews, football historian
Landscove, Devon

 

 

Daily Mail

Saturday, November 22, 2008

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS

Compiled by Charles Legge

Page 107

QUESTION

"Researching my family tree, I discovered one of my ancestors was named Mahala, a popular name in early 19th century. Was it
the Kylie, Chardonnay or Britney of its day?

FURTHER to the earlier answer, I am a carer looking after a lady called Mahala.

She was born in the year 1909 will be 99 next month.

She has always wondered where the name came from and was so pleased to find out from this column that it probably came from
the Hebrew for 'tender one'.

Mrs Pat Skinner,
Lewes, E. Sussex.

 

 

Daily Mail

Saturday, December 13, 2008

SATURDAY ESSAY

Extracted from The Fragmenting Family by Brenda Almond

Page 18/19

WHO'LL DEFEND THE FAMILY

Under attack; The traditional family unit provides the best upbringing for children (image omitted)"

"This week UNICEF warned of the dangers to British children in driving mothers back to work. Here, a leading philosopher argues the liberal establishment's on the family is the most profoundly tragic mistakes of our age

FROM almost the first moment of recorded history, one set of relationships has been at the heart of the human experience and the basis of civilisation itself: a mother and father who depend on each other; the children who rely on them both; a supportive network of grandarents, aunts, uncles and cousins.

Without the loyalties and obligations of the committed family, our ancestors would certainly have struggled to survive in a dangerous and frightening world.

How else but with the help of kin could they have coped with the critical moments in life: birth, sickness, old age, the need to educate and train their young? Without such help from the very beginning, it may be asked whether humankind would ever have developed the capacity to build an advanced civilisation.

This week a report from Unicef, the UN's child welfare agency, warned that working mothers take a massive risk when they put their offspring into low quality childcare.

Experts at the world body said such toddlers could suffer psychological harm and fare poorly later at school. Aggressive behaviour learned by children at some nurseries might contribute later to classroom disruption.

The study for is the first major international report to warn of the dangers of the drive, pushed again by the Government this week, to get mothers back to work early.

But the family has a. significance that goes way beyond the practicalities of day-to-day existence. From the very beginning, it has also given a special meaning to our human notions of past, present and future.

Human beings could have regarded themselves as isolated individuals whose meaningless lives were snuffed out and forgotten after a brief span. Instead — a hugely important factor in driving social development — we have always tended to see ourselves as part of a great chain of existence, binding us to our forebears and to generations yet unborn.

`To forget your ancestors is to be a brook without a source, a tree without a root,' says the old Chinese proverb. That undoubtedly reflects one of our deepest human instincts.


In Britain, G. K. Chesterton summed it up strikingly more than 100 years ago when he described the family as 'this frail cord, flung from the forgotten hills of yesterday to the invisible mountains of tomorrow'.

To modern ears, those words may sound some what romantic, or even a trifle overblown. But back in 1900, his view would have been shared by the overwhelming majority of MPs, lawyers, academics and the wider public. Until very recently, in fact, the importance of the family was taken for granted, not only as the basis of society, but as the foundation of our human identity.

Today? In western societies — and especially in the English-speaking world — we think we know better. Forget the wisdom of the ages. Forget our deep- rooted instincts. Forget precepts that have governed every society in every era of history. The importance of the 'traditional' family is being challenged as never before.

The idea has taken root that human families can be constructed in any way people want. The message is that biology counts for nothing.

Biological mothers don't matter to their children. Biological fathers don't matter either. All that matters is what adults want — and children must adapt to it, whether they-like it or not.

The sheer speed of what is happening is quite astonishing. In less than 50 years, the old values have been stood on their head. Today, legislators don't hesitate to plunge into 'reforms' that tear up the rights, duties and obligations that have underpinned the family for millennia.

They rush into new 'post- modernist' concepts of family, partnering and parenthood. Indeed, they are even attempting to banish the word 'marriage' from the statute books.

Everywhere in the West, the liberal consensus is on the march. In Britain, for example, a Labour Government has discouraged the use of the 'm' word in official documents, while in the U.S., the American Law Institute recommends that marriage should be `deprivileged' and not be given a status above any other relationship.

Yet on any rational analysis, this reckless embrace of a brave new world is simply perverse, since there is no doubt whatever that the traditional family, underpinned by marriage, is the best way of bringing up secure, happy children and maintaining social stability.

You don't have to be a religious believer or a Victorian moralist to take this view. The evidence speaks for itself (despite the strenuous efforts of the liberal establishment to ignore it).

Fact: one in two unmarried couples splits up before their first child is five years old. The figure for married couples is just one in 12.

Fact: children from broken homes are 75 per cent more likely than their classmates to fail at school, 70 per cent more likely to be involved with drugs and 50 per cent more likely to have alcohol problems. They are also more likely to run away from home, find themselves in the care system and end up in jail.

At the very least, those bleak statistics should give us pause. The truth is that some of the most intractable problems facing Britain today — from our tragically high rate of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases to petty crime, gang membership and welfare dependency — have their roots in family breakdown.

That's not to say that all families are perfect. Sometimes, sadly, it can be for the best that a child is removed from its parents. Sometimes, it is for the best when couples separate.

And it is certainly true that many, many children are brought up wonderfully in lone-parent households. All credit to the mothers — and sometimes fathers — who manage to do so.

But that doesn't invalidate the general principle. By ignoring the real benefits that marriage brings to children and wider society our legislators are making profound error of judgment - perhaps the most serious mistake of the past half-century.

So how have we come to this As I outline in my new book there are a whole range a complex reasons — not least the hatred of the family that some shallow-thinking but influentiaL intellectuals feel.

They continue to promote the message that traditional family structures have no place in world of gender equality.

OUR elected representatives have played their part, too, by demoting marriage as an institution, weakening its contractual aspects and promoting the dogma that 'family' is just legal and social convention.

Take the shabby way successive governments have treater marriage in this country, even though they know perfectly well that it is one of the great foundations of society.

It was a Tory Chancellor Kenneth Clarke, who dismissed the married couples' tax allowance as 'an anomaly'. And it was former Home Secretary Jack Straw who proclaimed 'This Government will not preach about marriage.'

The result? In Britain today it just doesn't pay to get married Our tax and benefits system is so arranged that if lower-income / Page 19 / couples who are living together get married, they will significantly increase their tax payments and their their benefits.

Perhaps it's no wonder that this country has a higher percentage of lone-parent families than any other country in Europe, apart from Sweden.

The system is designed to create family instability. And the costs, both social and financial, are huge.

How to explain this bizarre discouragement of an institution so important to the happiness, stability and financial health of the country?

Politicians are terrified of being thought 'judgmental' about the way citizens live. And they obviously take the defeatist view that nothing can be done to improve matters anyway.

Isn't it curious, then, that those same politicians feel no compunction at all about bossing us around to tell us to stop smoking, cut down our drinking and eat five portions of fruit a day?

The same aversion to moralising applies increasingly to the laws on marriage and divorce. Not only are we witnessing ever easier divorce — whatever the children may need or want — and same-sex marriages, but there is also growing pressure to remove the words 'father' and 'mother' from birth certificates and replace them by 'Progenitor A' and 'Progenitor B' (as is already happening in Spain).

Whatever the motivation behind such trends, the 'traditional' family structure is being badly eroded.

All this reminds me of the grim ideas floated in ancient Athens 2,500 years ago. In the vision sketched out in Plato's Republic — a philosophical treatise on the most fundamental principles of the conduct of human society — mating would be random.

Children would be raised by the state. Neither mothers nor fathers could claim their biological offspring as their own. Nor could they raise their children.

In Plato's bleak prescription, men and women would join together briefly, then separate. Fathers had children by many mothers. Mothers bore children by different men. A disturbing scenario indeed.

BUT isn't Plato's view now triumphant? In a few brief decades, the western world has so altered the traditional concept of
the family that it's possible to recognise the basic elements of the Platonic blueprint.

Ideas which once seemed just a speculative nightmare now appear to be an emerging reality. And yet the family in its traditional form is crucial to us all — not simply because it underpins social stability or because it connects us to the past and the future, but because it's also a bulwark of freedom itself.

Why? Because the invisible bonds it creates between its members generate loyalties and affections capable of resisting any tyranny.

That's what, in the end, makes the family not just a conserving institution, but also the engine of liberty and progress.

Yes, the family can sometimes fail. When it does, the consequences can be appalling. But at its best, it provides an anchor for individuals who would otherwise have no inspiration or support in an uncertain world.

For these reasons we should think long and hard about where we are being taken by some of the fashionable dogmas of our day: the belief that divorce or separation doesn't hurt; that what adults do can't seriously harm their children; that cohabiting is at least as good as marrying; that genetic relationships don't matter; and that 'family' can mean whatever we want it to mean.

All of these dogmas are false. All are deeply damaging. Every day we can see the consequences in broken families and broken lives.
In allowing matters to come to this, the liberal establishment has made arguably the most profound mistake of the past half-century. Dare we allow it to continue?"

 

 

I

ME

THE

FAMILY

9 THE FAMILY FAMILY THE 9

FAMILY

THE

THE FAMILY FAMILY THE

2+8+5 6+1+4+9+3+7 6+1+4+9+3+7 2+8+5

THE FAMILY FAMILY THE

THEFAMILY FAMILYTHE

2+8+5+ 6+1+4+9+3+7 6+1+4+9+3+7+ 2+8+5

THEFAMILY FAMILYTHE

ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1

ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA

THE FAMILY FAMILY THE

THE LIGHT IS RISING RISING IS THE LIGHT

THE FAMILY ATLMEFYHI IHYFEMLTA FAMILY THE

THE FAMILY ATLMEFYHI 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 IHYFEMLTA FAMILY THE

 

 

Daily Mail

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Page 34

".........999........."

 

 

Daily Mail

Tuesday, April 30, 2009

Page 33

".........Called 999........."

".........dialled 999........."

".........called 999........."

 

 

Daily Mail

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

By James Slack Home Affairs Editor

Page 4

Don't phone 999, simply send police a text message!

".........call 999........."

 

 

Daily Mirror

Friday, March 6, 2009

By Tom Pettifor

Page 19

".........dial 999........."

 

 

Daily Mail

Thursday, April 30, 2009

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS

Compiled by Charles Legge

Page 74

QUESTIONS

Q: My son Major Matthew Bacon was killed by a roadside bomb in Basra in 2005, and my wife Maureen and I are supporters of
the Military Families Support Group, who told us a remarkable story. Earlier this month, an email was received by the group from a couple in Sweden.

They told how, on March 21 this year, while walking in the forest near their home, their dog found nine remembrance cards, each of which had the name of a soldier printed on it. One of those soldiers was our son. The nine cards had each been attached by red ribbon to nine white balloons which had all burst but were together. Who sent the balloons? How did they get to Sweden? How did so many of - them land in the same place?
Roger Bacon, Address supplied.

" nine remembrance cards"

"The nine cards had each been attached by red ribbon to nine white balloons which had all burst but were together"

 

 

Daily Mail

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Page 69

"......... WOW........."

 

 

Daily Mirror

Friday, March 6, 2009

Page 19

"......... WOW........."

 

 

Daily Mirror

Friday, March 6, 2009

By Martin Fricker

Front Page

"IS THIS IT? THIS IS IT!"

 

 

THE LIGHT IS RISING NOW RISING IS THE LIGHT

 

 

0
-
Z
=
8
-
4
ZERO
64
28
1
1
-
O
=
6
-
3
ONE
34
16
7
2
-
T
=
2
-
3
TWO
58
13
4
3
-
T
=
2
-
5
THREE
56
29
2
4
-
F
=
6
-
4
FOUR
60
24
6
5
-
F
=
6
-
4
FIVE
42
24
6
6
-
S
=
1
-
3
SIX
52
16
7
7
-
S
=
1
-
5
SEVEN
65
20
2
8
-
E
=
5
-
5
EIGHT
49
31
4
9
-
N
=
5
-
4
NINE
42
24
6
45
-
-
-
42
-
40
Add
522
225
45
4+5
-
-
-
4+2
-
4+0
Reduce
5+2+2
2+2+5
4+5
9
-
-
-
6
-
4
Deduce
9
9
9

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
-
Z
=
8
-
4
ZERO
64
28
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
O
=
6
-
3
ONE
34
16
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
2
-
T
=
2
-
3
TWO
58
13
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
T
=
2
-
5
THREE
56
29
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
F
=
6
-
4
FOUR
60
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
5
-
F
=
6
-
4
FIVE
42
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
S
=
1
-
3
SIX
52
16
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
7
-
S
=
1
-
5
SEVEN
65
20
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
E
=
5
-
5
EIGHT
49
31
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
N
=
5
-
4
NINE
42
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
45
-
-
-
42
-
40
Add
522
225
45
-
1
4
3
8
5
18
14
8
9
4+5
-
-
-
4+2
-
4+0
Reduce
5+2+2
2+2+5
4+5
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+8
1+4
-
-
9
-
-
-
6
-
4
Deduce
9
9
9
-
1
4
3
8
5
9
5
8
9

 

 

1
-
O
=
6
-
3
ONE
34
16
7
2
-
T
=
2
-
3
TWO
58
13
4
3
-
T
=
2
-
5
THREE
56
29
2
4
-
F
=
6
-
4
FOUR
60
24
6
5
-
F
=
6
-
4
FIVE
42
24
6
6
-
S
=
1
-
3
SIX
52
16
7
7
-
S
=
1
-
5
SEVEN
65
20
2
8
-
E
=
5
-
5
EIGHT
49
31
4
9
-
N
=
5
-
4
NINE
42
24
6
45
-
-
-
34
-
36
Add
458
197
44
4+5
-
-
-
3+4
-
3+6
Reduce
4+5+8
1+9+7
4+4
9
-
-
-
7
4
9
Deduce
17
17
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Produce
1+7
1+7
-
9
-
-
-
7
-
9
Essence
8
8
8

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
O
=
6
-
3
ONE
34
16
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
2
-
T
=
2
-
3
TWO
58
13
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
T
=
2
-
5
THREE
56
29
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
F
=
6
-
4
FOUR
60
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
5
-
F
=
6
-
4
FIVE
42
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
6
-
S
=
1
-
3
SIX
52
16
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
7
-
S
=
1
-
5
SEVEN
65
20
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
E
=
5
-
5
EIGHT
49
31
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
N
=
5
-
4
NINE
42
24
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
45
-
-
-
34
-
36
Add
458
197
44
-
1
4
3
8
5
18
14
8
9
4+5
-
-
-
3+4
-
3+6
Reduce
4+5+8
1+9+7
4+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+8
1+4
-
-
9
-
-
-
7
4
9
Deduce
17
17
8
-
1
4
3
8
5
18
14
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Produce
1+7
1+7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
7
-
9
Essence
8
8
8
-
1
4
3
8
5
9
5
8
9

 

 

0
-
4
ZERO
8
5
9
6
-
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
1
1
-
3
ONE
6
5
5
-
-
=
16
1+6
=
7
-
7
2
-
3
TWO
2
5
6
-
-
=
13
1+3
=
4
-
4
3
-
5
THREE
2
8
9
5
5
=
29
2+9
=
11
1+1
2
4
-
4
FOUR
6
6
3
9
-
=
24
2+4
=
6
-
6
5
-
4
FIVE
6
9
4
5
-
=
24
2+4
=
6
-
6
6
-
3
SIX
1
9
6
-
-
=
16
1+6
=
7
-
7
7
-
5
SEVEN
1
5
4
5
5
=
20
2+0
=
2
-
2
8
-
5
EIGHT
5
9
7
8
2
=
31
3+1
=
4
-
4
9
-
4
NINE
5
9
5
5
-
=
24
2+4
=
6
-
6
45
-
40
Add
42
70
58
43
12
-
225
-
-
63
-
45
4+5
-
4+0
-
4+2
7+0
5+8
4+3
1+2
-
2+2+5
-
-
6+3
-
4+5
9
-
4
Reduce
6
7
13
7
3
-
9
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
4
Deduce
6
7
4
7
3
-
9
-
-
9
-
9

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
=
1
-
5
ADDED
18
18
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
T
=
2
-
2
TO
35
8
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
A
=
1
-
3
ALL
25
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
M
=
4
-
5
MINUS
76
22
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
4
NONE
48
21
3
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
S
=
1
-
6
SHARED
55
28
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B
=
2
-
2
BY
27
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
E
=
5
-
10
EVERYTHING
133
61
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
M
=
4
-
10
MULTIPLIED
121
49
4
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
I
=
9
-
2
IN
23
14
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
9
ABUNDANCE
65
29
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
58
First Total
995
266
59
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
14
8
18
-
-
3+5
-
5+8
Add to Reduce
9+9+5
2+6+6
5+9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1+4
-
1+8
-
-
8
-
13
Second Total
23
14
14
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
5
8
9
-
-
-
-
1+3
Reduce to Deduce
2+3
1+4
1+4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
4
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
1
2
3
8
5
6
5
8
9

 

 

UNCONDITIONAL LIFE

MASTERING THE FORCES THAT SHAPE PERSONAL REALITY

Deepak Chopra 1991

A Mirage of Miracles

Page 89

"The Mask of Maya"

"...denoting the ability of gods to change form, to make worlds, to assume masks and disguises."

"Maya also means magic a show of illusions"

"Maya also denotes the delusion of thinking that you are seeing reality when in fact you are only seeing a layer of trick effects superimposed upon the real reality

True to its deceptive nature, Maya is full of paradoxes. First of all it is everywhere, even though it doesnt exist. It is / Page 90 / often compared with a desert mirage, yet unlike a mirage Maya does not merely float "out there" The Mysterious One is nowhere if not in each person. Finally Maya is not so omnipotent that we cannot control it - and that is the key point Maya is fearfull or diverting all powerful or completely impotent depending on your perspective."

"The fearfull illusion becomes a wonderful show if only you can manipulate it."

 

 

W
=
5
-
8
WEPWAWET
116
35
8
O
=
6
-
6
OPENER
73
37
1
O
=
6
-
2
OF
21
12
3
T
=
2
-
3
THE
33
15
6
W
=
5
-
4
WAYS
68
14
5
-
-
24
4
23
Add to Reduce
311
113
23
-
-
2+4
-
2+3
Reduce to Deduce
3+1+1
1+1+3
2+3
-
-
6
-
5
Essence of Number
5
5
5

 

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
WEPWAWET
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
35
-
8
WEPWAWET
116
35
35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OPENER
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
-
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
R
=
9
-
-
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
37
-
6
OPENER
73
37
37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
OF
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
F
=
6
-
-
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
12
-
2
OF
21
12
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
THE
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
H
=
8
-
-
H
8
8
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
15
-
3
THE
33
15
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
WAYS
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Y
=
7
-
-
Y
25
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
S
=
1
-
-
S
19
10
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
4
WAYS
68
23
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
4
23
Add to Reduce
311
122
113
4
3
4
-
-
50
18
21
8
9
-
-
2+3
-
2+3
Reduce to Deduce
3+1+1
1+2+2
1+1+3
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
1+8
2+1
-
-
-
5
-
5
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
3
4
-
-
5
9
3
8
9

 

WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
-
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
R
=
9
-
-
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
9
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
F
=
6
-
-
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
H
=
8
-
-
H
8
8
8
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
-
8
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
Y
=
7
-
-
Y
25
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
S
=
1
-
-
S
19
10
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
4
23
Add to Reduce
311
122
113
4
3
4
-
-
50
18
21
8
9
-
-
2+3
-
2+3
Reduce to Deduce
3+1+1
1+2+2
1+1+3
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
1+8
2+1
-
-
-
5
-
5
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
3
4
-
-
5
9
3
8
9

 

WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
S
=
1
-
-
S
19
10
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
3
4
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
-
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
3
4
5
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
F
=
6
-
-
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
3
4
-
6
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
Y
=
7
-
-
Y
25
7
7
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
7
-
-
H
=
8
-
-
H
8
8
8
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
-
8
-
R
=
9
-
-
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
3
4
-
-
-
-
9
-
23
4
23
Add to Reduce
311
122
113
4
3
4
-
-
50
18
21
8
9
-
-
2+3
-
2+3
Reduce to Deduce
3+1+1
1+2+2
1+1+3
-
-
-
-
-
5+0
1+8
2+1
-
-
-
5
-
5
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
3
4
-
-
5
9
3
8
9

 

WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS

 

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
S
=
1
-
-
S
19
10
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
=
1
-
-
A
1
1
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
T
=
2
-
-
T
20
2
2
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
N
=
5
-
-
N
14
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
E
=
5
-
-
E
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
W
=
5
-
-
W
23
5
5
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
O
=
6
-
-
O
15
6
6
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
F
=
6
-
-
F
6
6
6
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
P
=
7
-
-
P
16
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
Y
=
7
-
-
Y
25
7
7
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
H
=
8
-
-
H
8
8
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
R
=
9
-
-
R
18
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
23
4
23
Add to Reduce
311
122
113
4
3
4
50
18
21
8
9
-
-
2+3
-
2+3
Reduce to Deduce
3+1+1
1+2+2
1+1+3
-
-
-
5+0
1+8
2+1
-
-
-
5
-
5
Essence of Number
5
5
5
-
3
4
5
9
3
8
9

 

WEPWAWET OPENER OF THE WAYS

 

 

MAGI THE MAGIC SEE THE MAGI

C

THE

MAGIC

ART THOU MAGI THE MAGIC MAGI THE MAGIC THOUART

 

 

3
THE
33
15
6
9
ENNEAGRAM
78
42
6
12
First Total
111
57
12
1+2
Add to Reduce
1+1+1
5+7
1+2
3
Second Total
3
12
3
-
Reduce to Deduce
-
1+2
-
3
Essence of Number
3
3
3

 

 

-
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
10
1+0
=
1
-
1
=
1
-
-
-
14
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
28
12+8
=
10
1+0
9
=
9
-
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
5
1
7
9
1
4
+
=
32
3+2
=
5
-
5
=
5
-
-
5
-
-
5
1
7
18
1
13
+
=
50
5+0
=
5
-
5
=
5
-
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
14
14
5
1
7
18
1
13
+
=
78
7+8
=
15
1+5
6
-
6
-
-
5
5
5
5
1
7
9
1
4
+
=
42
4+2
=
6
-
6
-
6
-
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
occurs
x
2
=
2
-
2
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
TWO
2
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
THREE
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
4
occurs
x
1
=
4
-
4
-
-
5
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
4
=
20
2+0
2
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
SIX
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
7
SEVEN
7
1
=
7
-
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
EIGHT
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
occurs
x
1
=
9
-
9
19
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
26
-
-
9
-
42
-
24
1+9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
2+6
-
-
-
-
4+2
-
2+4
10
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
6
1+0
-
5
5
5
5
1
4
9
1
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
6

 

 

9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
10
1+0
=
1
-
1
=
1
-
-
14
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
=
28
12+8
=
10
1+0
9
=
9
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
5
1
7
9
1
4
+
=
32
3+2
=
5
=
5
=
5
-
5
-
-
5
1
7
18
1
13
+
=
50
5+0
=
5
=
5
=
5
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
14
14
5
1
7
18
1
13
+
=
78
7+8
=
15
1+5
6
-
6
-
5
5
5
5
1
7
9
1
4
+
=
42
4+2
=
6
-
6
-
6
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
occurs
x
2
=
2
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
4
occurs
x
1
=
4
-
4
-
5
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
4
=
20
2+0
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
7
occurs
x
1
=
7
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
9
occurs
x
1
=
9
-
9
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
26
-
-
9
-
42
-
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
2+6
-
-
-
-
4+2
-
2+4
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
6
-
5
5
5
5
1
4
8
1
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
E
N
N
E
A
G
R
A
M
-
-
8
-
-
9
-
6
-
6

 

 

-
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
5
5
-
-
+
=
10
1+0
=
1
=
1
=
1
-
-
-
14
14
-
-
+
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
1
=
1
-
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
`-
5
-
-
5
1
+
=
11
1+1
=
2
=
2
=
2
-
`-
5
-
-
5
1
+
=
11
1+1
=
2
=
2
=
2
-
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
`-
5
14
14
5
1
+
=
39
3+9
=
12
1+2
3
=
3
-
-
5
5
5
5
1
+
=
21
2+1
=
3
=
3
=
3
-
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
occurs
x
1
=
1
=
1
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
TWO
2
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
THREE
3
-
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
FOUR
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
5
5
5
-
-
-
5
occurs
x
4
=
20
2+0
2
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
SIX
6
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7
SEVEN
7
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
EIGHT
8
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
NINE
9
-
-
-
-
-
39
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
6
-
-
5
-
21
-
3
3+9
-
5
5
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2+1
-
-
12
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
6
-
-
5
-
3
-
3
1+2
-
5
5
5
5
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
6
-
-
5
-
3
-
3

 

 

5
E
N
N
E
A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
5
5
-
-
+
=
10
1+0
=
1
=
1
=
1
-
-
14
14
-
-
+
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
1