ORACLE.htm

CITY OF REVELATION
John Michell 1972

Page 36 3 + 6 = 18 1 + 8 = 9 3 x 6 = 18 1 + 8 = 9

" St Augustine in The City of God also writes of the perfection of number 6, for 'in this did God make perfect all his works. Wherefore this number is not to be despised, but has the esteem apparently con-firmed by many places of scripture. Nor was it said in vain of God's works: "Thou madest all things in number, weight and measure." ' It is the unique property of number 6, on account of which it was held perfect, that it is both the sum and the product of all its factors excluding itself, for 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 and 1 x 2 x 3 = 6.
6 is the number of the cosmos, and the Greek word,..." "...sig-nifying the cosmic order, has the value by gematria of 600. The ancient astronomers adopted the mile as the unit which measures the cosmic intervals in terms of the number 6, and procured the follow-ing sacred numbers:

Diameter of sun
Diameter of moon
Diameter of earth
Mean circumference of earth
Speed of earth round sun
Distance between earth and moon

= 864,000 miles ( 12 x 12 x 6000 )
= 2160 miles ( 6 x 6 x 60 )
= 7920 miles ( 12 x 660 )
= 24,883.2 miles (12 x 12 x 12 x 12 x 1.2)
= 66,600 miles per hour
= 6 x 60 x 660 miles or 60 x earth's radius "

Zed Aliz Zed took an oblique look, a squinting of the eye bringing a re focus.

Diameter of sun
Diameter of moon
Diameter of earth
Mean circumference of earth
Speed of earth round sun
Distance between earth and moon

= 864 ,000 miles
= 216 0 miles
= 792 0 miles
= 24,883.2 miles
= 66,6 00 miles per hour
= 6 x 60 x 660 miles = 2376 00

= 864 ,000 miles
= 216 0 miles
= 792 0 miles
= 24,883.2 miles
= 66,6 00 miles per hour
= 6 x 60 x 660 miles = 2376 00

2

+

4

+

8

2

+

+

8
2
7
8
6
3

+
+
+
+
+
+

6
1
9
3
6
7

+
+
+
+
+
+

4
6
2
2
6
6

=
=
=
=
=
=

18

18
27
18
18

1

1
2
1
1

+
+
+
+
+
+

8

8
7
8
8

=
=
=
=
=
=

9
9
9
9
9
9

Fingerprints of the Gods
Graham Hancock 1995
Chapter Nineteen

Page 153 1 + 5 + 3 = 9

"In Egypt's early dynastic period, more than 45 00 years ago, an 'Ennead' of nine omnipotent deities was particularly adored by the priesthood at Heliopolis. 5 Likewise in central America both the Aztecs and the Mayas believed in an all-powerful system of nine deities."
the Pan book of

ASTRONOMY
James Muirden 1964

Page 63 6 + 3 = 9

"We now know the solar system to consist of nine planets."

GODS
Of The New Millennium
Alan F. Alford

Page 161

Lessons in Astronomy

Few people realise that the 7 days of the week - Sunday to Saturday - were originally named after an astronomical source. Ironically, they derive from the time of Ptolemy in /
Page 162 1 + 6 + 2 = 9 / the second century AD and his incorrect theory that the Sun, Moon and five planets revolved around the Earth. Thus were the days named after the Sun (Sunday), the Moon (Monday), Mars (mardi), Mercury (mercredi), Jupi-ter (jeudi), Venus (vendredi) and Saturn (Saturday / samedi)."

 
THE MAGIC MOUNTAIN 
 Thomas Mann. 
 1875 - 1955

Quote

        "I tell them that if they will occupy themselves with the study of            mathematics 
 they will find in it the best remedy against the lusts of the flesh.

NUMBER 9
The Search for the Sigma Code
Cecil Balmond

Page 5

"One...two...three....My eye went over the figures. Suddenly I saw something. There were hidden patterns; the old man's story about secret num-bers came back to me and I became curious. I started to look into these simple ideas and the more I searched the more fascinated I became. Something was indeed going on underneath the surface of arithmetic and what appeared as a unique calculation to the outside

/ Page 6 /

world was something quite different when viewed from below. Looked at another way, six and six was not necessarily twelve but something much more exciting - the number 3, of a secret code..."

Page 5

"...The thing to do is to follow the path until all the clues are in place and let your mind run free. It is only then that you find what the young master saw: the fixed points in the wind."

"...it is in this spirit I dedicate the journey to you. Follow the clues, build up the jigsaw piece by piece and make your own investigations; become part of the search. Go back in time and let the free spirit in you enter. Talk to it, play ask the strangest questions.
Start to count again in the simplest of ways,
one, two, three, four...up to nine.

CITY OF REVELATION
John Michell 1972

Page 36 3 + 6 = 18 1 + 8 = 9 3 x 6 = 18 1 + 8 = 9

= 864 ,000 miles
= 216 0 miles
= 792 0 miles
= 24,883.2 miles
= 66,6 00 miles per hour
= 6 x 60 x 660 miles = 2376 00

2

+

4

+

8

2

+

+

8
2
7
8
6
3

+
+
+
+
+
+

6
1
9
3
6
7

+
+
+
+
+
+

4
6
2
2
6
6

=
=
=
=
=
=

18

18
27
18
18

1

1
2
1
1

+
+
+
+
+
+

8

8
7
8
8

=
=
=
=
=
=

9
9
9
9
9
9

Fingerprints of the Gods
Graham Hancock 1995
Chapter Nineteen

Page 153 1 + 5 + 3 = 9

The Pan book

ASTRONOMY
James Muirden 1964

Page 63 6 + 3 = 9

"We now know the solar system to consist of nine planets."

GODS
Of The New Millennium
Alan F. Alford

Page 161

Lessons in Astronomy

Few people realise that the 7 days of the week - Sunday to Saturday - were originally named after an astronomical source. Ironically, they derive from the time of Ptolemy in / Page 162 1 + 6 + 2 = 9 / the second century AD and his incorrect theory that the Sun, Moon and five planets revolved around the Earth. Thus were the days named after the Sun (Sunday), the Moon (Monday), Mars (mardi), Mercury (mercredi), Jupi-ter (jeudi), Venus (vendredi) and Saturn (Saturday / samedi)."

TheFingerprints Of The Gods
Graham Hancock

Page 274 "The pre-eminent number in the code is 72. To this is frequently added 36,making 108 , and it is permissible to multiply 108 by 100 to get 10,800 or to divide it by 2 to get 54 , which may then be multiplied by 10 and expressed as 540 (or as 54,000 , or as 540,000 , or as 5,400,000 , and so on). Also highly significant is 2160 ( the number of years required for the equinoctial point to transit one zodiacal

/ Page 275 /

constellation), which is sometimes multiplied by 10 and by factors of ten (to give 216,000, 2,160,000 , and so on) " andsometimes by 2 to give 4320 , or 43,200 , or 432,000 , or 4,320,000 ,ad infinitum."

973 eht namuh 973 page 19

Nature's Numbers
Ian Stewart 1995

Numerology is the easiest-and consequently the most dangerous-method for finding patterns. It is easy because anybody can do it and dangerous for the same reason. The difficulty lies in distinguishing significant numerical patterns from accidental ones. Here's a case in point. Kepler was fasci-nated with patterns in nature, and he devoted much of his life to looking for them in the behaviour of the planets. He devised a simple and tidy theory for the existence of precsely six planets (in his time only Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn were known). He also discov-ered a very strange pattern relating the orbital period of a

/
planet- the time it takes to go once around the Sun-to its distance from the Sun. Recall that the square of a number is what you get when you multiply it by itself: for example, the square of 4 is 4 x 4 = 16. Similarly, the cube is what you get when you multiply it by itself twice: for example, the cube of 4 is 4 x 4 x 4 = 64. Kepler found that if you take the cube of the distance of any planet from the Sun and divide it by the square of its orbital period, you always get the same number. It was not an especially elegant number, but it was the same for all six planets.
Which of these numerological observations is the more significant? The verdict of posterity is that it is the second one, the complicated and rather arbitrary calculation with squares and cubes. This numerical pattern was one of the key steps towards Isaac Newton's theory of gravity, which has explained all sorts of puzzles about the motion of stars and planets. In contrast, Kepler's neat, tidy theory for the number of planets has been buried without trace. For a start it must have been wrong, because we now know of nine planets, not six. There could be even more, farther out from the Sun, and small enough to be undetectable But more important, we no longer expect to find a neat, tidy theory for the number of planets. We think that the Solar System con-densed from a cloud of gas surrounding the Sun, and the number of planets presumably depended on the amount of matter in the gas cloud, how it was distributed, and how fast and in what directions it was moving. An equally plausible gas cloud could have given us eight planets, or eleven; the number is accidental, depending on the initial conditions of the gas cloud, rather than universal, reflecting a general law of nature" /

Zed Aliz said. In that case, would Albert have thought of other, than a number nine tram
The scribe, meanwhile noted that, in the main text. "nine planets" occupies the nineteenth line down of page 103

Page 6 /

" The big problem with numerological pattern-seeking is that it generates millions of accidentals for each universal. Nor is it always obvious which is which. For example, there are three stars, roughly equally spaced and in a straight line, in the belt of the constellation Orion. Is that a clue to a signifi-cant law of nature?
Here's a similar question. Io, Europa, and Ganymede are three of Jupiter's larger satellites. They orbit the planet in , respectively, 1.77, 3.55, and 7.16 days. Each of these numbers is almost exactly twice the previous one. Is that a significant pattern? Three stars in a row, in terms of orbital period. Which pattern if either, is an important clue..."
"… In addition to numerical patterns there are geometric ones…"
"… Until recently the main shapes that appealed to mathe-maticians were very simple ones: triangles, squares, pen-

/ Page 7 /

tagons, hexagons, circles, ellipses, spirals, cubes, spheres, cones, and so on. All of these shapes can be found in nature, although some are far more common, or more evident, than others. The rainbow, for example, is a collection of circles, one for each colour. We don't normally see the entire circle just an arc; but rainbows seen from the air can be complete circles. You also see circles in the ripples on a pond, in the human eye, and on butterflies' wings.
Talking of ripples, the flow of fluids provides an inex-haustible supply of nature's patterns. There are waves of many different kinds-surging toward a beach in parallel ranks, spreding in a V-shape behind a moving boat, radiating outward from an underwater earthquake…"
"…There are swirling spiral whirlpools and tiny vortices. And there is the appar-ently structureless, random frothing of turbulent flow, one of the great enigmas of mathematics and physics. There are similar patterns in the atmosphere, too, the most dramatic being the vast spiral of a hurricane…"
"…There are also wave patterns on land. The most strikingly mathematical landscapes on Earth are to be found in the great ergs, or sand oceans, of the Arabian and Sahara deserts. Even when the wind blows steadily in a fixed direction, sand dunes form. The simplest pattern is that of transverse dunes, which-just like ocean waves-line up in parallel straight rows at right angles to the prevailing wind direction. Some-times the rows themselves become wavy. in which case they are called barchanoid ridges; sometimes they break up into

/ Page 8 /

innumerable shield-shaped barchan dunes. If the sand is slightly moist, and there is a little vegetation to bind it together, then you may find parabolic dunes-shaped like a U, with the rounded end pointing in the direction of the wind. These sometimes occur in clusters, and they resemble the teeth of a rake. If the wind direction is variable, other forms become possible. For example, clusters of sand shaped dunes can form, each having several irregular arms radiating from a central peak. They arrange themselves in a random pattern of spots.