Hello, I have never posted on here and have just made this account, however I have been visiting this site for a couple of years now. Forgive me, this may not belong on here but I'm not sure that there's any group of people better suited to give me insight than all of you.
Over the past year, I have found myself being followed by a number, 444. This first started happening a year ago. My friends and I decided to write notes and then burn them together on new years. I wrote two notes, one about my past, and one about my future. In the future note, I asked for some kind of sign so I would know my notes and messages had been read and seen by, well, whatever higher power there is. I'll refer to it as the universe I suppose. That's when I started being followed by 444. I would wake up at 4:44 am, and my phone would be on 44%. This happened day after day. It would be 4:44 pm, and my phone would be on 44%, day after day after day. I then stumbled upon a song on YouTube, it was titled something along the lines of New Years Eve. It had 444 views and 44 likes. I see it everywhere. License plates, the numbers of likes and comments on social media apps and sites, taxi cabs, commercials, songs, the hospital, anywhere it could show up it shows up. Sometimes I can connect it to things going on in my life depending on where and what I see it on, and every time I can connect it in some way it foreshadows the future. Other times it's just there, and I can't connect it to anything. I've googled it and researched it all I can, but it hasn't helped me much. I've tried to find possible meanings behind it on here as well, but so far I haven't found anything worth noting.
I was wondering if any of you have had a similar experience, or if any of you have found/can find something on here about the number. I'd just like to understand more about this number, and what it means. Hopefully someone on here can help me.
Followed by 444
-
Redbeck
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2147
- Joined: 19 Dec 2010 15:42
- Location: The Rookery, 3rd Horse Chestnut along, St Johns, Britain. Teacher leave our nuts alone!
- Contact:
Re: Followed by 444
Dear fourforfour welcome to the Oracle Forum your experience contribution is both fascinating and highly pertinent to the essence of the unfolding work. Redbeck.
A power of fours
Since the publication of a paper in1956, by American psychologist George Miller in the influential journal Psychological Review, the psychological bar for the number of items which the mind can cope with before it becomes confused has been set at the ‘magic’ number seven.
Miller argued that the mind could only handle a maximum of seven chunks of information in his paper, entitled ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’, becoming one of the most highly cited psychology articles and dubbed by the Psychological Review as its most influential paper of all time.
However, a new analysis by a leading Australian psychiatrist challenges this long-established benchmark, suggesting the number might actually be four.
UNSW professor of psychiatry Gordon Parker says a re-analysis of the experiments conducted by Miller, upon which his conclusion was based, demonstrate that he missed the correct number by a considerable distance.
Writing in the journal Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Scientia Professor Parker believes a closer examination of the evidence shows that the human mind copes with a maximum of four 'chunks' of information, not the original seven.
Parker’s proffers the example of a seven numeral phone number 6458937, saying that in order to remember it, we need to break down into four chunks or less: 64. 58. 93. 7. Basically determining that four is the limit to our perception.
This represents a discrepancy of almost 100 per cent and a huge difference for a paper that is perhaps one of the most frequently referenced psychology articles ever, the Australian professor suggests.
While Professor Parker agrees 50 years post-Miller, that uncertainty about the nature of the brain's storage capacity limits remains: ‘There may be no limit in storage capacity per se but only a limit to the duration in which items can remain active in short-term memory,’ he admits.
But continues, ‘Regardless, the consensus now is that humans can best store only four chunks in short-term memory tasks’.
The full discussion paper includes many exemplars of the magic of 'four'.
But four is a frequent occurrence for many of us. Playing cards is one such, why four suits, therefore four of every card is this because when playing a game of cards when we need to statistically remember previous hands and possibilities then 4 is our limit. Did our ancestors already know this?
In horse racing Biblical measures still apply to distance, 4 furlongs = half a mile, a furlong = 40 rods
The term square was originally foursquare.In The King James Bible Revelation 21:16 referring to the new Jerusalem: ‘And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.’
Yes I do believe that we can be chased by specific numbers. Indeed immediately prior to the arrival of your post Dave Denison the founder and primary content architect of 973-eht-namuh-973.com was involved in an information exchange which exemplifies the power of 4s and excitedly drew my attention to the text below:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TREASURED MEASURE = 444
MIND BORN SONS, THOSE PATENT PATIENT PATENTED PATTERN MAKERS.
MIND=4 BORN=4 SONS=4 THOSE=4 PATENT=4 PATIENT=4 PATENTED=4 PATTERN=4 MAKERS=4
Book of Revelation The New Jerusalem
The New Jerusalem and the River of Life (Apocalypse XII), Beatus de Facundus, 1047
Facundus, pour Ferdinand Ier de Castille et Leon et la reine Sancha - Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional
The angel measures the New Jerusalem with the rod or reed. Note the Lamb of God and the twelve sets of figures, gates, and stones.
Facundus, pour Ferdinand Ier de Castille et Leon et la reine Sancha - Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional
A power of fours
Since the publication of a paper in1956, by American psychologist George Miller in the influential journal Psychological Review, the psychological bar for the number of items which the mind can cope with before it becomes confused has been set at the ‘magic’ number seven.
Miller argued that the mind could only handle a maximum of seven chunks of information in his paper, entitled ‘The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information’, becoming one of the most highly cited psychology articles and dubbed by the Psychological Review as its most influential paper of all time.
However, a new analysis by a leading Australian psychiatrist challenges this long-established benchmark, suggesting the number might actually be four.
UNSW professor of psychiatry Gordon Parker says a re-analysis of the experiments conducted by Miller, upon which his conclusion was based, demonstrate that he missed the correct number by a considerable distance.
Writing in the journal Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Scientia Professor Parker believes a closer examination of the evidence shows that the human mind copes with a maximum of four 'chunks' of information, not the original seven.
Parker’s proffers the example of a seven numeral phone number 6458937, saying that in order to remember it, we need to break down into four chunks or less: 64. 58. 93. 7. Basically determining that four is the limit to our perception.
This represents a discrepancy of almost 100 per cent and a huge difference for a paper that is perhaps one of the most frequently referenced psychology articles ever, the Australian professor suggests.
While Professor Parker agrees 50 years post-Miller, that uncertainty about the nature of the brain's storage capacity limits remains: ‘There may be no limit in storage capacity per se but only a limit to the duration in which items can remain active in short-term memory,’ he admits.
But continues, ‘Regardless, the consensus now is that humans can best store only four chunks in short-term memory tasks’.
The full discussion paper includes many exemplars of the magic of 'four'.
But four is a frequent occurrence for many of us. Playing cards is one such, why four suits, therefore four of every card is this because when playing a game of cards when we need to statistically remember previous hands and possibilities then 4 is our limit. Did our ancestors already know this?
In horse racing Biblical measures still apply to distance, 4 furlongs = half a mile, a furlong = 40 rods
The term square was originally foursquare.In The King James Bible Revelation 21:16 referring to the new Jerusalem: ‘And the city lieth foursquare, and the length is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal.’
Yes I do believe that we can be chased by specific numbers. Indeed immediately prior to the arrival of your post Dave Denison the founder and primary content architect of 973-eht-namuh-973.com was involved in an information exchange which exemplifies the power of 4s and excitedly drew my attention to the text below:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TREASURED MEASURE = 444
MIND BORN SONS, THOSE PATENT PATIENT PATENTED PATTERN MAKERS.
MIND=4 BORN=4 SONS=4 THOSE=4 PATENT=4 PATIENT=4 PATENTED=4 PATTERN=4 MAKERS=4
Book of Revelation The New Jerusalem
The New Jerusalem and the River of Life (Apocalypse XII), Beatus de Facundus, 1047
Facundus, pour Ferdinand Ier de Castille et Leon et la reine Sancha - Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional
The angel measures the New Jerusalem with the rod or reed. Note the Lamb of God and the twelve sets of figures, gates, and stones.
Facundus, pour Ferdinand Ier de Castille et Leon et la reine Sancha - Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional
Re: Followed by 444
Hi fourforfour, you will find a lot of information with reference to the number 4
just click on link below..
http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/Alchem ... PHABET.htm
Best wishes hope..
just click on link below..
http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/Alchem ... PHABET.htm
Best wishes hope..
-
packajos000
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: 28 Jan 2016 04:10
- Contact:
Re: Followed by 444
When Elf’s And Tree Attending Hath Diminished,
He Of Fear Came Unto,
Twas Now It At Winter,
Aye The Ayes Given Attend,
Attended:
Fear: “Bring Forth Me Thyne Bark, And Cut Thy Arms So Shall I Flame And Dire Warmth”,
Tree: “Ye Art In Need?”
“Aye”,
“To Find And Feast Of Thy Prey?”
“Aye; Without Warmth, Nay-Aye”,
“So Thou Hast Stumbled Upon Me, That Flame Hast Not Bore Mine Death?”
“Aye”,
“Is It Naught, That Prey Searches For Thee, Whence He Turneth Him Back And Cannst Hasten Thy Sight?”
“Aye, As Doth I”,
“So To Find Thy Longing Thou Must Stumble Upon Warmth,
Thou Hast Stumbled Upon Me,
And Warmth Potential I Hasten”
“I Understand Aught Of Thy Cause!”
“Set Mine Death. Feed Thy Longing. And Ye Shall Find”
Elf Set The Death Of Tree, And Warmth Was Given,
[The Death Of Tree],
Elf Searched, Yet Coudst Not He Find The Prey,
Unto Alas, That Flame In The Hills Flamed,
Of Prey Making Warmth,
And Signal Was Found, Whence The Sought Of [The] Prey...
?
...
..
.
He Of Fear Came Unto,
Twas Now It At Winter,
Aye The Ayes Given Attend,
Attended:
Fear: “Bring Forth Me Thyne Bark, And Cut Thy Arms So Shall I Flame And Dire Warmth”,
Tree: “Ye Art In Need?”
“Aye”,
“To Find And Feast Of Thy Prey?”
“Aye; Without Warmth, Nay-Aye”,
“So Thou Hast Stumbled Upon Me, That Flame Hast Not Bore Mine Death?”
“Aye”,
“Is It Naught, That Prey Searches For Thee, Whence He Turneth Him Back And Cannst Hasten Thy Sight?”
“Aye, As Doth I”,
“So To Find Thy Longing Thou Must Stumble Upon Warmth,
Thou Hast Stumbled Upon Me,
And Warmth Potential I Hasten”
“I Understand Aught Of Thy Cause!”
“Set Mine Death. Feed Thy Longing. And Ye Shall Find”
Elf Set The Death Of Tree, And Warmth Was Given,
[The Death Of Tree],
Elf Searched, Yet Coudst Not He Find The Prey,
Unto Alas, That Flame In The Hills Flamed,
Of Prey Making Warmth,
And Signal Was Found, Whence The Sought Of [The] Prey...
?
...
..
.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests