The missing chapter in the history of digital art
Posted: 24 Jun 2026 08:03
Hello dear snamuh,
Something has been turning over in my head, and I'd like to put it to people who know the work better than I do.
When Denison set down the brush — the Eht Namuh canvas, Le Grand Puppeteer, the faces between portrait and abstraction — the surrealist's tools didn't disappear.
They migrated. The colour switches, the hand-coloured tables, the abracadabra triangle: the site does on a screen what the paintings did on canvas. In the histories of digital art I read for my work, that chapter is simply missing, and it shouldn't be.
For the long-timers : did David ever speak of the site as a continuation of the painting, or as a clean break ?
Peace,
O.
Something has been turning over in my head, and I'd like to put it to people who know the work better than I do.
When Denison set down the brush — the Eht Namuh canvas, Le Grand Puppeteer, the faces between portrait and abstraction — the surrealist's tools didn't disappear.
They migrated. The colour switches, the hand-coloured tables, the abracadabra triangle: the site does on a screen what the paintings did on canvas. In the histories of digital art I read for my work, that chapter is simply missing, and it shouldn't be.
For the long-timers : did David ever speak of the site as a continuation of the painting, or as a clean break ?
Peace,
O.
