The Difference Between Illuminati and Freemasonry

[ibad]

Popular history books and encyclopaedias generally mention that the origin of illuminatin went to Bavaria in 1776. Indeed, it is suggested that the origin of illuminatin goes back further and is directly related to freemasonry and ancient Egyptian cults.

His statement was first used by Menendez Pelayo in 1492 and described the group called "Alumbrados" in Spain. It is believed that the Alumbrados group received highly confidential information from an unknown high power, and that upper human level could be reached with this knowledge. This group was strongly condemned by the Catholic Church in 1623 and thus the first war between the church and the secret societies began.

enlightened


Some claim that a group called "Enlightened," for the first time in the 11th century, was found by Joachim Floris and accepted the doctrine of "poverty and equality" as a doctrine of Christian doctrine. In this way it is suggested that the origin of illuminatin is actually Christianity. Afterwards, it is said that this group is prone to violence and that the rich have robbed and broken off from Christianity.

Some say that the origin of illuminatin is based on Ismailili, a cult of Islam (you can visit here for more detailed information on Ismailili), Hassan Sabbah and therefore the Hassans. Founded by Hassan Sabbah in 1090, this group went to the point of killing people who thought they were obstacles to enlightenment by using assassins.

Killing was a mystical experience for the Hassassites. They believed that not only did their targets clear an obstacle in front of them, but also that they were cleansed spiritually and that the victim's spirit energy passed on to them. In fact, it is said that this ritual is the source of inspiration for satanists who believe they sacrifice human beings and animals later.

It is believed that primitive tribes live the same mystical experience with dances and drums, and dance and songs are offered to the societies by illusion in the modern world.

Illuminati and freemasonry are considered to be secret societies that have existed for many years. Members are generally intellectuals and are generally unknown to the public and remain secret. What is known is that both illumina and freemasonry have some common points in the field of science and politics.

Freemasons are a brotherhood founded in the 16th century. Masons are connected to the Great Locals and are independent of each other.

Both illumina and freemasonry are the groups of intellectuals from the free thinkers. Both groups are secret communities and have different goals and objectives. It is believed that the illuminatinine is more left-handed and has targets for establishing a New World order, and it is believed that they are secretly working on it in the background. Masons are believed to have the goal of spreading honor and gentility among their group members. Illuminatin is said to be a secret society, and is more subject to conspiracy theories, and freemasonry is an official status society that does some charity work.

[Nazheek]

Illuminati was dissolved by the King of Bavaria

[ibad]

Do you know why it was canceled?

[Nazheek]

It wasn't canceled, more like violently destroyed by a paranoid king. A shame then, I agreed with many of their teachings.

[BeN1]

--------------------

[Nazheek]

It wasn't canceled, more like violently destroyed by a paranoid king. A shame then, I agreed with many of their teachings.

If not with all.
But I do not know all, but all I know is, that the once I know were not so bad...

Am reading Goethe's Faust right know, they say he was 1, 2 ...

Ist wahrlich ein herrlich Unterfangen,
zu lesen aus Zeiten, die längst vergangen!

That german writing, it is was feines, meines Erachtens.

Ganz ehrlich? Ich bin nicht überrascht, dass es den Bayern, dass die Organisation beendet. Sie sicher, dass Sie wissen, wie man feiert.

If an organization with the same principles of the organization was to be made, I would certainly support. Particularly the portions about religion. While I don't believe in dissolution of religion as they did, I think we should take on a unified spirituality. By spirituality, I don't mean religion. I think people need spiritual unity, not physical unity. I suppose thats where me and the site separate our views. I don't particularly believe in a singular world government, but rather a spiritual view that unites us all, somewhat like what the Freemasons practice.

[BeN1]

--------------------

[Nazheek]

In my opinion, religion does seperate people, but on the other side it brings on 1 question 2 me, that how do we manage 2 know about god, without religion...?

Not we, but the generations coming...?

Is it even possible...? I wouldn't want to say no, but in my opinion religion isn't more bad than good, you know...?

I doubt any deity, chief architect or not, would much care if we knew at this point.

But yes, religion is both divisive and conclusive. If we mean to keep it, we should find ways for everyone to coexist. Jews, Christians, Muslims. Buddhists, Taoists, Heathens and Wiccans.

[Redbeck]

The Enlightenment-era's secret society known as the Bavarian Illuminati embraced a set of key objectives: To oppose superstition, obscurantism, religious influence over public life, and abuses of state power. All conditions which 240 years of evolution later continue to proliferate around the world. The Illuminati, along with Freemasonry and other secret societies, were outlawed under an edict issued by the Bavarian ruler Charles Theodore most ironically in collaboration with the Roman Catholic Church, in the late 18th century. They were said to have gone underground and been the core influencers of the French Revolution.I am thoroughly alarmed when religion begins to creep through the corridors of political power for it means it is up to no good when it should be a power for doing good, a fault line which exposes true spiritual corruption. There are a multitude of heinous acts against humankind conducted in the name of any number of religions, when they should be a pillar for the people not an unprincipled power over the people.

Detail of the figure said to be Juan Borgia in The Disputation of St Catherine, from the Borgia Apartments in the Vatican